Log in to send Wolfenhart a ping...
New auction: big tiefling
Pretty sure it was blurred to prevent you from looking at the details which show either an embarrassing lack of knowledge about many things, including how many toes people have or indicates the usage of AI generation (considered theft & not allowed)
New auction: Mouse Adopt by Wolfenhart (base used! check description) SALE!
New auction: Mouse Adopt by Wolfenhart (base used! check description)
New sale: ADOPT | bat werewolf
New auction: Mouse Adopt by Wolfenhart (base used! check description)
If the debate had been more objective, you would have sent good evidence of the use of AI, but instead you simply subjectively assessed her art
Like I said, my mistake. I was wrong to do so. I should have done more research & not been rude to the artist. But I'm not gonna make an entire document of proof on a site where AI-generated work is submitted on a daily basis, it would be completely exhausting and besides that utterly pointless because nothing would be done about it either way.
I think if a person in a dispute allows himself to do such things, then I can afford it.
A childish approach but I guess we all have our way of coping with the world around us. Don't confuse my intention here, you do have every right to respond in such a manner, I just don't think it's productive or helpful at all.
Do you think the fact that you accused her of using AI and pointed out the wrong details in her drawings to prove it is not an insult to her art? I have nothing more to talk to you about
Something I have already sincerely apologized for. I think it's quite hypocritical of you to turn to insults and then immediately sit on your high horse, but I guess that's your personal thing to sort out and live with. My qualms are with AI-art and I was wrong in my assessment of its use, not with actual artists. So again, I was wrong and therefore I am sorry. I'm also sorry to the artist for offending them. I'm not sorry for telling you it's a d*ck move to insult my art in "defense"of another artist
It's quite strange that you define AI by such factors. The artist’s account on deviantart is full of illustrations, from which you can understand that this is not ai. You get to the bottom of the artist’s painting style and errors in the physiology of the characters, when you yourself do not notice such errors in your works. These are your works, am I right? https://twitter.com/vi_is_laifu/status/1654319019770380289/photo/ https://twitter.com/vi_is_laifu/status/1699235578921857476/photo/1 https://www.instagram.com/p/CmIoG-wI7z2/?igshid=NjIwNzIyMDk2Mg== By your own logic, the hands in these illustrations are not well drawn, and also in the illustration with the sea character it seems as if you simply outlined the line using a different reference. (I judge by your own logic)
Also, d*ck move to immediately go and tell me my art is not well drawn, without me saying anything about the quality of the art of the person this conversation is actually about. Boo.
That's it!
Ping